On page 222, de Tocqueville writes: “There is nothing as irresistible as a tyrannical power commanding in the name of the people, for while being clothed in the moral strength derived from the will of the greatest number, it also acts with the decision, speed and tenacity of a single man.”
In a tyranny, no discussion is necessary, and decisions are quick. Why not combine this popular support, and achieve a very desirable government? This idea has obvious appeal. It also has a serious lack of truth.
Compare China and India. The explosive growth in each is similar. They pursue GDP with equal "decision, speed and tenacity." Yet India has a democracy while China has a tyranny.
De Tocqueville has had several important insights on democratic culture, but his political theory is lacking.
Erik,
ReplyDeleteThe India - China comparison is getting a lot of attention of late, at least until our eyes were focused on North Africa. If you want to pursue this tack, I think you'll find that the form of government is important as are mores, habits, and laws. One arena of vivid difference is population growth.
LDL